contact ME

I look forward to hearing from you. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions, concerns, thoughts, suggestions, speaking requests, writing ideas, good jokes, great quotes, wisdom, or mind-bending puzzles.

Please fill out this form to contact me.

 


Grand Rapids, MI

grand_rapids_through_broken_glass.jpg

Embarking Blog

...on the journey towards restoration of all things

Filtering by Tag: J-I- Packer

Spiritual Formation

admin

As a Pastor of Spiritual Formation, I've been giving a lot of thought into the development of people into disciples of Christ.  I'm continuing to work on a process at my own church that will hopefully begin to launch in the fall that takes people from the starting point of faith, and gives them some next steps until the point when they're multiplying other disciples.  Sounds very modern and linear of me, doesn't it!  It is and it isn't.  More on that later. But, given that, I ran across an article by Gordon MacDonald from the Leadership Insight called "So Many Christian Inants."  I definitely resonate with the sentiments in this article.    Here is a poignant moment in the article:

I have concluded that our branch of the Christian movement (sometimes called Evangelical) is pretty good at wooing people across the line into faith in Jesus. And we're also not bad at helping new-believers become acquainted with the rudiments of a life of faith: devotional exercise, church involvement, and basic Bible information—something you could call Christian infancy.  But what our tradition lacks of late—my opinion anyway—is knowing how to prod and poke people past the "infancy" and into Christian maturity.

So true.  Remember that famous quote (who said it... people disagree... Packer, Colsen, Chesterton... I think Chesterton first?) "American Christianity is thousands of miles wide, but only an inch deep."  Evangelicalism has so focused on conversionism (see The Future of Evangelicalism 4, The Future of Evangelicalism 5) and the atonement that we've forgotten some of the important depth that the whole sciptures teach, and our part in multiplying disciples.  Multiplying converts is of course of first importance, but that's only the beginning stage.  Lately, I've been thinking of conversion more as "changing allegiance" from one kingdom to another, and that once you enter the kingdom, then everything begins.

MacDonald also hits on something I've been talking a lot about lately.  Here's how he says it:

The marks of maturity? Self-sustaining in spiritual devotions. Wise in human relationships. Humble and serving. Comfortable and functional in the everyday world where people of faith can be in short supply. Substantial in conversation; prudent in acquisition; respectful in conflict; faithful in commitments. Take a few minutes and ask how many people you know who would fit such a description.

In fact, I just gave a friend MacDonald's book The Resilient Life because it talks about just that - how to live a life in which you become more and more Christlike as you approach death.  In some classes I've been teaching, I ask the following question to start to get at a definition and a starting point for growth, "If having Jesus formed in us is the goal (remember, Paul was in the pains of childbirth so that Christ would be formed in his followers - Galatians 4:19), then what would it look like if Jesus were living your life?  How would he look in your shoes, during your day, with your gifts, and your opportunities?  Now, where are you in comparison to that? (That's not a question to elicit guilt, as you might imagine since I'm reformed)  Now, what is the next thing you can do to move towards having Christ formed in you?  What areas need the most work?  If you focused on one area, which one would bear the most fruit of transformation?"  Then, we can begin to develop a plan to develop spiritually. 

Our traditional answer to that question is to develop programs.  Again, MacDonald:

You need programs to make large churches go: kind of like the automakers need an assembly line that stamps out fenders as fast as possible... But mature Christians do not grow through programs or through the mesmerizing delivery of a talented speaker (woe is me) or worship band. Would-be saints are mentored: one-on-one or, better yet, one-on-small group (three to twelve was Jesus' best guess). The mentoring takes place in the streets and living-places of life, not church classrooms or food courts. And it's not necessarily done in Bible studies or the like. Mature Christians are made one by one through the influence of other Christians already mature.

So there's the catch, and I couldn't agree more.  I've been harping on this in my own church and trying to - not eliminate programs (they can serve a very important role) - but to lower their value and raise the value of the person-to-person interacdtion.  We were wired for relationships, and we don't grow as well on our own.  And that's what MacDonald is questioning:  how many of us are willing to really commit to discipling others?  How many of us are being discipled?  We tend to lament the epidemic of Christian infancy, biblical illiteracy, and lack of leadership, and yet our focus seems so often to be placed in the wrong area.  This is a question of mine as of late:  "How do we move away from a programmatic potluck approach to Christian Education and towards a relational people process of spiritual formation and discipleship?"


Subscribe to Embarking Blog by Email

The Future of Evangelicalism 2

admin

This post doesn't deal as much with the "future of evangelicalism" but rather as a way of establishing our past and/ or current location.  Over the years, I've struggled to know what being evangelical means.  I have certainly been grounded in evangelicalism:

  1. My denomination has an evangelical stream, but is not considered an evangelical denomination.
  2. Personally - growing up - I was raised as an evangelical.  My most formational pastor in my middle and high school years was a former missionary to Chiapas, Mexico, and the church was a new church planted only about a year before we began attending.
  3. My mentor in college was a deeply evangelical and evangelistic pastor with a mind like John Stott's and a heart like Billy Graham's. 
  4. The first church I served was traditional and conservative, but theologically evangelical.
  5. The second church I served had a deep evangelical history (including deep involvement with Wycliffe, Intervarsity, built by a former pastor of Park Street Church in Boston, and some interaction with Francis Schaeffer) on the campus of the University of Michigan, but didn't "fit in" with many more conservative or fundamentalist evangelicals on campus.
  6. The church I serve now defines itself in its values as holding to "an evangelical and reformed understanding of the Christian Faith."

But even though this grounding is clearly a part of my history, there are a number of reasons I've struggled with this identity.  First, when someone who is spiritually seeking wants to know what "brand" of Christian I am, the answer would probably be "evangelical," but the follow up questions, "What do evangelicals believe" is not as easy to answer.  Second, there are a number of people who more tightly define evangelicalism to exclude myself and others of my friends who I would say are deeply theological.  (see "Lining Up" post).  Third, there are a number of streams within evangelicalism that are pulling at one another, fighting sometimes against one another, and vying for leadership for the future of evangelicalism.  I would argue that often these arguments are about "secondary issues" and not primary ones, while others would call primary what I would call secondary.  So, who says?  Who decides?


Subscribe to Embarking Blog by Email

The Future of Evangelicalism

admin

I've been thinking a lot for several years about the future of evangelicalism.  A number of writers over the past decade have written about both the past, the meaning of, and the future of evangelicalism.  There's no consensus. I guess I find this particularly interesting because I've always kind of wondered where I fit in the whole scheme of things.  I haven't written in a while on this blog, and part of the reason is that I've been on a journey of rediscovery for the past 4 months.  I've been returning to some roots of mine both theological, culturally, and in my own personal narrative.  It's been a fascinating ride, really.  I've had more clarity about what I believe, where I fit, how I'm evangelical, (how some people would say I'm not and why), why I'm drawn to the emerging church, why I'm drawn to the missional church, why I'm interested in the new monasticism, why I never feel comfortable with either a conservative evangelical or a liberal Christian label.  I've made peace with myself about why deconstruction is important to me and how it fits my reformed theological roots, and a lot more.

Anyway, all of this works together in me to in my concern over the future of the evangelical church.  Where are we headed?  Who is we?  Who decides who "we" is?  In the past, it seemed that our "pop" evangelicalism was lead by our pastor - JI Packer, our theologian - John Stott, and our evangelist - Billy Graham.  But with these leaders all aging and approaching the end of their earthly days, I wonder who will lead us, and whether we'll stay together.  There are certainly people vying for power over the label.  There's a resurgence of deeply conservative fundamentalism, a rise in global evangelical fruit, an upsurge of new reformed calvinists (or neo-calvinists), a hugely "successful" non-denominational mega-church movement with powerfully influential leaders, an emerging church alternative, and an increase in Pentecostal churches and much more.  So... what is the way forward for evangelicals?


Subscribe to Embarking Blog by Email